Logo der DOG
DOG

Anmeldung
Besonderheiten dieser Tagung
Hotels
Gesellschaften
Grussworte
Allgemeine Hinweise und Termine
Informationen f?r Teilnehmer
Zertifizierung
Hinweise f?r Autoren
DOG Informationen
Preise
Ablauf der Tagung
Lageplan
Themen
Wissenschaftliches Programm
Symposien
Kurse
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
Rahmenprogramm
Industrieaussteller
Sponsoren
Impressum
DOG Homepage

104. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft 2006

Abstract
Abstract

SO.12.09

Potential benefits of monocular augmented reality technology in the automobile production

Kampmeier J.1, Cucera A.1, Fritzsche L.2, Brau H.2, Duthweiler M.3, Lang G. K.1
1Augenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Germany; 2DaimlerChrysler AG, Ulm, Germany; 3DaimlerChrysler AG, Wörth, Germany

Objective: Augmented Reality (AR) enriches the true environment with visual data that has the potential to benefit operator tasks. Enhanced (augmented) reality provides the user with the possibility of location independent and context appropriate data. Data is presented to the dominant eye using laser technology over a Head-Mounted-Display (HMD) unit comprising a semi-transparent mirror. This study will evaluate the potential benefits of this new AR technology.
Methods: Fortyfive visually normal subjects were randomised into 3 study groups who completed a variety of tasks in the course of a simulated work day. Group 1 received conventional work aids (printed documents) to complete the tasks. Group 2 additionally wore an HMD unit that was turned off. Group 3 wore only a functional HMD unit without additional aids. Subjective evaluation was carried out by means of a standardised BMS-questionnaire and a d2-Concentration-Strain-Test.
Results: No significant difference was noted between the study groups in terms of mental strain, concentration performance, or in the physical/mental complaints noted subjectively during debriefing. Ten subjects reported pressure and blurred vision in both eyes as well as headaches.
Conclusions: Changes in objective ophthalmologic investigation parameters were not observed in any subjects. Subjects reported reduced acceptability of the HMD unit on non-ophthalmologic grounds, for example the weight of the unit or the length of the cable. However, advantages can be seen in terms of optimisation of operator tasks.


Zurück | Back